Name
by Ben McLane, Esq.
The professional name that an artist performs under is a valuable commodity to both
the artist and to any record company that releases the artist. Both the artist and
the record company should be concerned that the name is protected, and that the
rights in the name are reserved and understood. Usually, a record contract will
have provisions dealing with the name, whether it is the artist's real name or
a professional name. This article will discuss some of the common problems
surrounding names.
The record label will essentially be concerned with two aspects of the name. First,
the label will demand that the artist warrant and represent that the name used by
the artist is in fact owned by the artist. Second, the label will demand that
the artist grant to the label the right to use the name for publicity and promotion
of the artist's recordings.
Often, the ownership of the name is disputed. There are three common scenarios:
A. There could be a question as to who owns the name between the artist and a third
party (i.e., producer, production company, label, manager). In these situations,
there is usually a contract between the artist and the third party that sets forth
who in fact owns the name.
B. There could be a question as to who owns the name between two, or more, different
groups who all perform under the same name. The actual ownership is usually decided
by which artist performed under (i.e., used) the name first. However, there is a
legal term called "secondary meaning" which could override first use. A secondary
meaning is when the public identifies a name with a particular artist. The Rolling
Stones are a good example. There is no question as to who this name refers to.
It could be that another act using the name the Rolling Stones was around first,
but the public identification is with the famous group. If the artist is just
starting out and finds itself in a situation where there is a rival claim to
the name, it is probably better to change the name early on to avoid legal
hassles.
C. There could be a question as to who owns the name between the members of a group.
This becomes a problem if a member leaves or the group breaks up. It is advisable for
the group to enter into a partnership agreement, or form a corporation, so that this
issue is dealt with in advance.
An artist should also be wary of any record label that attempts in the contract to have
ownership rights in the name transferred to the label. The artist must refuse this
request because it is unfair for the label to benefit from owning a name that the
artist created and developed.
In conclusion, a name is very important and great care should be taken in selecting it,
protecting it and clarifying ownership in it.
Copyright 1998, Ben McLane
E-Mail Us
McLane & Wong
11135 Weddington Street, Suite #424
North Hollywood, CA 91601
Telephone: 818.587.6801 Fax: 818.587.6802
Email: bcmclane@aol.com
|